What is lacking in the annual goal stating that a student will identify angles using a protractor?

The goal stating that a student will identify angles using a protractor is indeed lacking in specificity regarding the criterion for accuracy. In educational goals, especially those related to special education, it's essential to define how accurately the student should perform the task. For example, the goal could be improved by specifying a percentage of accuracy (such as identifying angles correctly at least 90% of the time) or defining the acceptable range of error.

This element is critical because it sets a clear standard for success and helps in tracking the student's progress. Without this criterion, it would be challenging to determine whether the student has met the objective effectively. Having a well-defined criterion ensures that both the educator and the student understand the expectations, which is vital for targeted instruction and meaningful assessment.